Betts card is way off...

[dave654]

Lets get basic, Betts had 693 PA, 96 BB. minus the 3 IBB we work with 690 PA. divided by 36 to get an avg number of rolls per number, equals 19.16666… what ever. Basic math, the Z and W factors equate to a minus 1 BB per 14. Betts has four 14’s times 18 = 76. WAY OFF,
Where is the 5th 14?
Same with HBP? One 15 = 4 HBP. Betts had 8 HBP, so what other number can be a HBP with runner on 1st like a 15, but can be placed on some other location than 53, like the 15. Maybe a missing 22?
So this card is TRUELY off.

p.s. Acuna and Arreaz are also like Betts in missing a whole 14 on their cards.

These are not subjective errors, but real easy to find math errors.
Please Correct.

[dave654]

Simple math indeed, lol 1+1, Arraez already has 2 14’s… Doh…

[mattlandis]

@dave654 I only see one at 45???

[dave654]

@mattlandis yep, I’m an Idiot, yes, 1